【 Jiang B. (2007), A topological pattern of urban street networks: universality and peculiarity, Physica A, 384, 647 - 655.】

The 40 U.S. urban street networks and their topological measures

Rank
City
State
α
Partition
n
m
l
lrand
Net
Shape
2
Los Angles
California
2.0
4(79%)
57752
4.2
7.3
7.6
9
Phoenix
Arizona
2.1
4(85%)
50683
3.4
7.7
9.0
3
Chicago
Illinois
2.0
5(82%)
44421
4.6
6.6
7.0
4
Houston
Texas
2.1
4(81%)
42873
3.7
8.5
8.1
154
Pasadena
Texas
2.1
4(80%)
37783
3.9
6.9
7.8
6
San Diego
California
2.3
4(84%)
30901
3.3
9.2
8.7
152
Hollywood
Florida
2.1
4(84%)
22582
3.5
7.3
8.1
8
Dallas
Texas
2.0
5(84%)
22491
4.3
6.9
6.9
61
Arlington
Texas
2.0
4(79%)
21652
3.9
7.1
7.3
63
Las Vgas
Nevada
2.2
3(78%)
19758
3.2
7.2
8.5
157
Sunnyvale
California
2.2
5(84%)
18253
3.3
6.6
8.1
65
St.Petersburg
Florida
2.1
4(81%)
16653
3.8
6.8
7.3
7
Detroit
Michigan
1.9
6(82%)
16148
5.3
5.5
5.8
10
San Antonio
Texas
2.0
5(84%)
16071
4.0
7.0
7.0
1
New York
New York
1.7
7(79%)
15172
6.9
6.5
5.0
60
Birmingham
Alabama
2.4
4(82%)
14987
3.5
8.9
7.8
95
Tacoma
Washington
2.2
3(80%)
14221
3.1
9.3
8.3
156
Sterling Heights
Michigan
2.2
4(84%)
10464
3.4
6.0
7.5
155
Moreno Valley
California
2.2
4(85%)
9871
3.3
7.3
7.8
58
Louisville
Kentucky
2.2
4(83%)
9862
3.5
6.7
7.4
89
Dayton
Ohio
2.1
4(80%)
8113
3.7
6.9
6.8
5
Philadelphia
Pennsylvania
1.8/4.2
6(82%)
7834
6.1
5.0
5.0
88
Greensboro
North Carolina
2.2
4(84%)
6662
3.4
6.9
7.2
158
Gary
Indiana
2.0
5(84%)
6365
4.1
7.5
6.3
96
Little Rock
Arkansas
2.1
4(79%)
6160
3.9
8.8
6.4
94
Spokane
Washington
2.0
5(80%)
5703
4.6
6.3
5.7
97
Bakersfield
California
2.1
4(82%)
5582
3.6
6.3
6.7
56
Newark
New Jersey
2.0
5(83%)
5485
4.4
5.9
5.8
57
Saint Paul
Minnesota
1.9
5(82%)
5403
4.6
5.2
5.6
99
Fort Wayne
Indiana
2.2
4(82%)
4668
3.5
6.3
6.7
98
Fremont
California
2.2
4(82%)
4667
3.5
6.3
6.7
64
Corpus Christi
Georgia
2.0
4(79%)
3822
4.1
5.7
5.9
59
Anaherim
California
2.3
3(79%)
3530
3.0
6.8
7.5
93
Columbus
Georgia
2.0
4(80%)
2878
3.7
6.1
6.1
62
Norfolk
Virginia
1.9
5(79%)
2808
4.5
5.3
5.3
153
Topeka
Kansas
2.0
5(83%)
2656
4.2
5.2
5.5
159
Beaumont
Texas
1.9
5(80%)
1911
4.7
5.3
4.9
100
Arlington
Virginia
2.0
5(84%)
1703
4.2
4.7
5.2
151
Laredo
Texas
1.7/4.2
6(79%)
1663
5.7
5.9
4.3
160
Fullerton
California
2.3
4(84%)
1499
3.2
5.6
6.2

(Rank = ranking according to population, α = power law curve exponent, partition = percentage around the average degree, n = number of streets, m = average degree of streets, l = path length, l rand = path length of the random counterpart)